Rachel Corrie's parents – a musician and an insurance agent from Olympia, Washington – have become unlikely international advocates, drawn into world affairs by Rachel's death.
Cindy Corrie had never left the U.S. before her daughter was killed. Her husband, Craig, had only left once: to serve as a U.S. combat engineer during the Vietnam war, where he oversaw U.S. military bulldozers clearing jungle paths.
Neither knew anything about the Middle East. Now they speak about Palestinian suffering in lectures across the world and of their own heartbreaking experience. They have also repeatedly visited the Palestinian territories, including the spot where Rachel was killed.
Rachel, the youngest of their three children, took a break from college at age 23 to pursue student activism overseas as a member of the International Solidarity Movement, a pro-Palestinian group whose activists often position themselves between Palestinians and Israeli soldiers.
Her death has become a hot-button issue between Israel and the Palestinians and their international supporters – who adopted Corrie as a potent symbol of what they consider Israel's harsh repression of nonviolent protest to occupation.
Her fellow activists claim she was killed deliberately.
Supporters of Israel argue that Corrie, like thousands of other foreign activists, recklessly chose to risk her life in a conflict zone where she could be harmed by soldiers who themselves often feel under assault.
On Sunday, Israel's Defense Ministry said in a statement responding to AP questions that it regretted "the incident in which Rachel Corrie was mistakenly hurt."
The family argues that the military investigation into their daughter's death was done poorly. Translations of trial testimonies provided by the Corries suggest that a commander told the military investigator not to question bulldozer operators and that the driver didn't have clear instructions on dealing with civilians.
The Corries have lobbied U.S. officials to pressure Israel to reopen the investigation into Rachel's death. And if the Supreme Court doesn't rule in their favor, the Corries say the will resume lobbying U.S. officials.
They have also tried unsuccessfully to sue Caterpillar Inc., the U.S. company that manufactured the bulldozer. They claimed the company was liable for aiding and abetting human rights violations.